|   |  電子期刊
 | ISSN:1684-193X 
  | Updated 
            
            July 26, 2003 |  
 
         
          |   |   
          | Contents: Volume 2, Number 1; July, 2003
 |   
          |  |   
          | Development 
              of a New Confined Space Model |   
          | Hsien-Fa Lee; Tzong-Luen Wang, MD, PhD; 
            Yi-Kong Lee, MD; Hang Chang, MD, PhD |   
          |  
                From the Research and Educatio Assessment development 
                (Lee HF) and Department of Emergency Medicine (Wang TL, Chang 
                H), Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital; Department of Emergency 
                Medicine(Lee YK), Buddish Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital.  Correspondence to Dr. Hang Chang, Department 
                of Emergency Medicine, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, 95 
                Wen Chang Road, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail M001043@ms.skh.org.tw   |   
          |  Abstract
 |   
          |  |  |   
          |   Confined 
              space medicine is one of the most important training for urban search 
              and rescue. However, the construction of a confined space for training 
              is usually time- and cost-consuming. To construct a virtual confined 
              space, we utilized the materials available at hand such as 30 to 
              50 long tables, 60 paper boxes, 20 large curtains, 4 Manikins for 
              resuscitation and intubation, 1 pack of flour, 5 rolls of sealing 
              tapes and 1 make-up box in six training courses in 2002. We designed 
              a questionnaire to evaluate the reality, difficulty, safety, creativity, 
              and applicability of the model. The time elapse for constructing 
              the virtual confined space was in average 45+5 min and that 
              for cleaning up 25+5 min. The average cost for setting up 
              the tunnel was 950+80 NSD. Of 432 questionnaires, the average 
              scores for 5 items were 7.8+1.4 for reality, 6.5+1.8 
              for difficulty, 9.0+0.6 for safety, 9.3+1.1 for creativity, 
              and 9.0+0.8 for applicability. For the items of applicability, 
              the subheadings of adequacy for practicing BTLS, definitive care, 
              communication, and full evaluation were obtained 9.4+1.4, 
              9.3+1.2, 8.6+1.4 and 8.3+1.5, respectively 
              (P<0.05 by ANOVA). In conclusion, we create a simple model of 
              virtual confined space that will be of help in the comparable training 
              courses. Key words---Confined Space Medicine; USAR; Virtual 
              Model; Disaster Medicine
 |   
          | 
 |  |   
          |  Introduction
 |  |   
          |  |  |   
          |  A confined space 
              is any space large enough to access, but has limited entry and is 
              unsuitable for continuous employee occupancy.1,2  
              Confined spaces usually contain the potential safety hazards such 
              as physical, chemical, or atmospheric injury.3  
              In additional, it deserves specific training for the rescuers to 
              operate any measures and procedures in the limited space in a time-efficient 
              manner.4  In the United States, Occupational 
              Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has implemented many guidelines 
              for confined space rescue.5  We also 
              think it is essential for us to have adequate confined space rescue 
              training in the viewpoint of disaster medicine.  
              Without proper training, confined space rescue becomes a game of 
              chance. OSHA studies demonstrated that hundreds of people have miscalculated 
              their chance for survival in confined space operations.5  
              The objective for the rescuer is to recognize when the odds are 
              stacked against them, and then to implement a change in the operation 
              to increase the margin of safety, or stack the odds in their favor. 
              However, most of the training sites for confined space rescue in 
              the United Sates contain training tower, trench rescue and water 
              tower rescue. They provide good virtual circumstances for the students 
              to operate under standard procedures.3  
              However, the buildings and equipments are space-occupying and need 
              good financial support. It may become a barrier for us to generalize 
              the training program in Taiwan. We then developed a simplified model 
              of confined space which mimics the real circumstances but is cost-effective.
             |   
          |  |  |   
          |  Methods |   
          |  |   
          | Designing the simple model of confined space |  |   
          | To construct a virtual confined 
              space, we utilized the materials available at hand such as 30 to 
              50 long tables, 60 paper boxes, 20 large curtains, 4 Manikins for 
              resuscitation and intubation, 1 pack of flour, 5 rolls of sealing 
              tapes and 1 make-up box. The steps of construction were as follows:
 1. Align the long tables face to face to form a tunnel with different 
              bending angle, height and width along the whole pathway. The basic 
              height of the tunnel was about 50 to 60 cm and the width less than 
              80 cm.
 2. Place the manikins in different areas along the tunnel, at least 
              5m apart each other. Each manikin was arranged with different orientation.
 3. Cover the tunnel with paper boxes and seal with tapes.
 4. Put some flour or powder to mimic the dusts that could be found 
              in the confined space.
 5. Cover the tunnel externally with the curtains or sheets to make 
              the tunnel poorly illuminated.
 6. Pre-set one end of the tunnel as the entry and the other the 
              exit.
 The time elapse for constructing the virtual confined space was 
              recorded and averaged.
 
 |   
          |  |  |   
          |  |   
          | Evaluation of the efficiency and safety 
            of the model |   
          | To evaluate the efficiency of the 
              model, we designed a questionnaire to analyze the opinions of the 
              students during disaster medical assistance team (DMAT) training 
              courses from January 2002 to December 2002. The questionnaire was 
              composed of 5 vision scales (scoring from 0 to 10) for the following 
              items: reality, difficulty, safety, creativity, and applicability. 
              Under the item of applicability, the student was asked to evaluate 
              the adequacy of practicing standard basic trauma life support (BTLS), 
              adaptation of definite care, communication and full evaluation within 
              the tunnel. The scores were recorded and averaged. |  |   
          |  |  |   
          | Statistical analysis |   
          | The categorical data were inputted in Microsoft Excel 
            2000 for descriptive statistics and further qualitative analysis. 
            ANOVA with a Newman-Keuls post hoc test was used to determine whether 
            any significant differences existed among continuous data. A P 
            < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. |  |   
          |  |  |   
          | 
               
                |  | Figure 1.Scorings for four subheadings of the item applicability |  |  |   
          |  |  |   
          |  Results |  |   
          |  |  |   
          | The data obtained 
              from six DMAT training courses were enrolled for analysis. The time 
              elapse for constructing the virtual confined space was in average 
              45+ 5 min and that for cleaning up 25+ 5 min. The average cost for 
              setting up the tunnel was 950+ 80 NSD.  
              There were 432 students who attended DMAT training course and completed 
              questionnaire. Three hundreds and twenty-eight of them were nursing 
              staffs, 44 physicians and 60 staffs of logistics or administrative. 
              The average scores for 5 items were 7.8+ 1.4 for reality, 6.5+ 1.8 
              for difficulty, 9.0+ 0.6 for safety, 9.3+ 1.1 for creativity, and 
              9.0+ 0.8 for applicability. No definite injury was documented during 
              six training courses.  
              For the items of applicability, the subheadings of adequacy for 
              practicing BTLS, definitive care, communication, and full evaluation 
              were obtained 9.4+ 1.4, 9.3+ 1.2, 8.6+ 1.4 and 
              8.3+ 1.5, respectively (Figure)  . 
              The latter two were significantly lower than the former two (P<0.05 
              by ANOVA).
             |  |   
          |  |   
          |  |  |   
          |  |  |   
          |  Discussion |  |   
          |  |  |   
          | According to past 
              experience, most disaster victims received search and rescue from 
              their neighbors, family, friends or the person who happen to be 
              at the disaster scene. Few victims are able to get prehospital care 
              from doctors or nursing staff due to hospital itself is a disaster 
              victim.6-9  Immediately after the occurrence 
              of disaster most of the staff in hospital has to manage their institute. 
              It is unrealistic to expect the help from hospital staff for an 
              external disaster at the first minute. In this study, we set up 
              the standard procedure as well as the simulated model of urban search 
              and rescue (USAR) in a confined space. We successfully complete 
              the provider manual as well as instructor manual of USAR in a confined 
              space. The publications can be used as a guideline in that kind 
              of scenario. 
              It is believed that the understanding of the unique environment 
              and knowledge of confined space medicine will enhance the survival 
              of and reduce morbidity in the extricated patient. Approach and 
              treatment needs to begin as soon as possible to maximize the chances 
              of survival. The chance of extricating a live victim drops usually 
              dramatically after 24 hours following the building collapse. Many 
              past experiences supported the concept.13-15 
              Confined space rescue involves mainly USAR and partially disaster 
              medical assistant teams.3,5 USAR is one of the emergency support 
              functions according to the design of the United States. Personnel 
              assigned to task forces of their USAR Response System are highly 
              trained and possess specialized expertise and equipment. Under their 
              incident command systems, so-called emergency support function #9 
              addresses only US&R instead of all other forms of search and 
              rescue (e.g., water, wilderness, subterranean) that are managed 
              under different authorities.3 To fulfill the requests that rapid 
              activation to complete rescue within 72 golden hours and response 
              for any incident or anticipated incident likely to result in overwhelming 
              collapsed structures, their training include incident support, structural 
              collapse technique, medical support and logistic support. In the 
              context of their medical specialist training, confined space medicine 
              is an important issue.3,10-12 Although a throughout confined space 
              medicine training include rescuer’s safety, atmospheric monitoring 
              and stabilization of the victims, a virtual confined space is essential 
              for such a training course.  
              To our knowledge, a virtual confined space includes the scene of 
              training tower, trench and water tower.5  
              According to the past experience of Fire Service Administration, 
              it still cost about 200 thousands NSDs even though only a simply 
              confined space was temporarily constructed. Besides, the safety 
              of the students might be another problem. Because of limitation 
              of space and cost, we developed a model of confined space for training 
              that could fulfill most of the skills that should be involved. The 
              design costs less than one thousand NSDs and is safe for each participant. 
              The model has the characteristics of a confined space including 
              limited entry and exist, narrow space, poor ventilation, poor illumination 
              and unstable infrastructure. The cost-effectiveness and safety guarantying 
              of the model provides a good way for generalization of confined 
              space training.  
              The limitations of the model for confined space medicine were as 
              follows. First, as the data revealed, the model could not provide 
              adequate training of communication and full evaluation because of 
              the use of the manikins at the scene. Further modification with 
              volunteer instead at the scene may increase the likelihood of confined 
              space rescue. How to apply some noise-proof appliances over the 
              tunnel should also be considered in the future. Second, the tunnel 
              mimicked mainly the condition of the trench, but could not simulate 
              well the conditions of training towers. In other words, our model 
              could not afford the operations in the descending of a vertical 
              hole. The same problem was also met in the situations of water towers. 
               
              In conclusion, we create a simple model of virtual confined space 
              that will be of help in the comparable training courses.
              
             |   
          |  References |  |   
          |  |  |   
          | 1. | Barbera JA, Cadoux CG. Search, rescue and evacuation. 
            Crit Care Clin 1991;7:321-37 |   
          | 2. | Barbera JA, Lozano M. Urban search and rescue medical teams: FEMA 
            task force system. Prehsopital Disaster Med 1993;8:349-55 |   
          | 3. | National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. A guide to 
            safety in confined spaces. Department of Health and Human Services 
            publication 87-113. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing 
            Office, 1987 |   
          | 4. | Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA USAR response system 
            task force medical team training manual. Washington, D.C.: Federal 
            Emergency Management Agency, November, 1993 |   
          | 5. | Occupational and Health Administration. Safety and health topics: 
            confined space. Available at: http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/confinedspaces/. 
            Accessed on March 22, 2003 |   
          | 6. | American College of Emergency Physicians. The role of the emergency 
            physician in mass casualty/disaster management. JACEP 1976;5:901 |   
          | 7. | Waeckerle JF. Disaster planning and response. N Engl J Med 1991;324:815-21 |   
          | 8. | Noji EK, Siverston KT. Injury prevention in natural disasters. 
            A theoretical framework. Disasters 1987;11:290-6 |   
          | 9. | Abrams JI, Pretto EA, Angus D, et al. Guidelines for rescue training 
            of the lay public. Prehospital Disaster Med 1993;8:151-6 |   
          | 10. | Kunkle RF. Emergency medical care in the underground environment. 
            J Wildrness Assoc Emerg Disaster Med 1986;10:54-5 |   
          | 11. | Federal Emergency Management Agency. Emergency support function 
            no. 9 --- urban search and rescue. The Federal Response Plan P.L. 
            93-288, April, 1992 |   
          | 12. | National Institute for Urban Search and Rescue. Available at: http://www.NIUSR.org. 
            Accessed on March 22, 2003 |   
          | 13. | Noji EK, Kelen GD, Organessian A, et al. The 1988 earthquake in 
            Soviet Armenia: a case study. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19;891-7 |   
          | 14. | de Ville de Goyet C, Jeannee E. Epidemiological data on morbidity 
            and mortality following the Guatemal earthquake. IRCS Med Sci So Med 
            1976;4:212 |   
          | 15. | Sanchez-Carillo CI. Morbidity following Mexico City’s 1985 earthquakes, 
            clinical and epidemiological findings from hospitals and emergency 
            units. Public Health Reports 1989;104:482-8 |   
          | . |  |   
          | . |  |   
          | . |  |   
          | . |  |   
          |  |  |       
 |