|   |  電子期刊
 | ISSN:1684-193X 
  | Updated 
            
             Oct 30, 2003 |  
 
         
          |   |   
          | Contents: Volume 2, Supplement 1; October, 2003
 |   
          |  |   
          |  |   
          | Chien-Chih Chen, MD; Tzong-Luen Wang, MD, PhD |   
          |  
                From the Department of Emergency Medicine (Chen 
                CC, Wang TL), Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital.  Correspondence to Dr. Tzong-Luen Wang, Department 
                of Emergency Medicine, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, 95 
                Wen Chang Road, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail M002183@ms.skh.org.tw   |   
          |  Abstract
 |   
          |  |  |   
          |    
              The continued proliferation 
              of nuclear materials and technology make nuclear terrorism more 
              probable than ever. After the attacks of September 11, 2001 in United States 
              of America, 
              the whole world was under the shadow of nuclear terrorism. A radiological 
              terrorist attack on the Taiwan is a possibility. It could involve the dispersal of radioactive material 
              by deployment of a radiation dispersal device, an attack on a nuclear 
              power plant or detonation of a nuclear weapon. But the possibility 
              of latter is less likely. To decrease the vulnerability to the threat 
              of radiological terrorism, the assessment of risk and the medical 
              teams should have a basic understanding of radiation hazards and 
              medical management. They should be prepared to interact with appropriate 
              government agencies to facilitate the employment of emergency response 
              plans.Key words--- Radiation Dispersal Device; Radiological Terrorism; Medical Teams
 |   
          | 
 |  |   
          |  History 
              of Radiation Incidents
 |  |   
          |  |  |   
          |  
              Three Mile 
                Island, Pennsylvania on March 28, 1979, equipment 
                malfunction compounded by human error led to the worst commercial 
                nuclear accident in U.S. That catastrophe 
                resulted in nuclear industry reform and a 
                antinuclear movement burgeon. Chernobyl reactor accident on April 
                26, 1986 is now known to have exposed more than 116,500 persons 
                and resulted in at least 28 deaths from acute radiation sickness.1,2 
                September 30,1999, technicians at a nuclear fuel reprocessing 
                plant in Japan accidentally set off a series of uncontrolled chain 
                reactions and released radiation by pouring too much uranium solution 
                into a holding tank. Despite the best medical care, two technicians 
                eventually died from the exposure.3  According to the record of radiation accidents 
                under Radiation Emergency Assistance Center-Training Site (REACTS),4 
                the number of radiation accidents has reached 403 with 133,617 
                victims, of which 2,965 had significant exposures and 120 persons 
                died in the world since 1994 to 2002 June.  As these emergencies illustrate, 
                significant health risks are associated with exposure to ionizing 
                radiation and radioactive contamination from nuclear accidents. 
                The fears related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and now 
                nuclear terrorism have also had significant adverse psychological effects. Without 
                question, any large-scale release of radioactive material into 
                the environment, whether accidental or intentional, has long-range 
                and complex effect. |  |   
          |  |   
          |  Possible Types of Attacks |   
          |  |   
          |  
              While the end of the Cold War 
                has drastically reduced the likelihood of nuclear warfare, the 
                continued proliferation of nuclear materials and technology make 
                nuclear terrorism more probable than ever.5 
                The types of radiological terrorist attacks 
                could occur as follows. |  |   
          |  |  |   
          | Radiological 
            dispersal events |   
          |   
              Deployment 
              of a radiation dispersal device (RDD) is a device used to disperse 
              radioactive materials without a nuclear detonation is called a radiation 
              dispersal device (RDD) or dirty bomb. RDDs 
              employ conventional explosives or other mechanisms to disperse 
              radioactive materials.  The second possibility is attack on a nuclear facility. Small or 
              highly localized larger amounts of radioactivity may be dispersed 
              with an bomb or other attacks to cause 
              fear and social disruption. Small radioactive sources, such as those 
              used in common medical applications, could be placed in a small 
              container and dispersed by bomb or moving vehicle. Individual exposure 
              would be low. The effects would be primarily psychosocial, with 
              no immediate health effects and a small risk of long-term adverse 
              health effects. Industrial sources contain higher quantities of 
              radioactive materials than those found in medical settings. Powerful 
              explosives in a nuclear facility could spread large quantities of 
              radioisotopes over a large area. Many of the injured would be contaminated 
              by radiation. Life-threatening injuries could result from both the 
              explosive event and radiation exposure. The area of dispersion depends 
              on the amount of explosive, atmospheric conditions, and adherence 
              of radioactive material to dust and other dispersed materials. Finely 
              dispersed particles or metal debris could cause ground contamination 
              and adhere to structural surfaces. The psychosocial effects would 
              be tremendous. Commercial nuclear reactors contain large quantities 
              of radioactive materials, but are very well protected. In 
              the unlikely event of a successful attack on a nuclear reactor resulting 
              in there release of radiation. Other potential targets, such 
              as spent fuel storage depots, nuclear-fuel reprocessing facilities, 
              transport vehicles, or high-level waste sites contain much less 
              radioactive material than do reactors.6
 |  |   
          | Nuclear 
              weapons |  |   
          |  
              A nuclear bomb constructed by a terrorist organization would 
                probably be a single device with a low yield of 0.01 to 10 kilotons 
                (kt). A more sophisticated, compact, 
                higher yield device, with a yield of 10 kt or higher, might be acquired by buying or stealing a stockpiled 
                nuclear weapon. So deployment of a nuclear weapon is much less 
                likely than a radiation dispersal event. The effects of the detonation 
                of a high-yield device include:1.          
                 Air blast is a shock wave of air 
                that travels outward from the point of explosion and is associated 
                with strong winds that cause personal injuries and structural 
                damage. Injuries and fatalities can be caused directly by the 
                blast and indirectly by air-borne objects and falling debris.
 2.          
                 Heat results from the fireball 
                generated by a nuclear explosion. It is extremely hot, igniting 
                materials and projecting heat over long distances, causing thermal 
                burns.
 3.          
                 Intense light 
                can damage to eyesight and cause temporary 
                or permanent blindness.
 4.          
                 Ionizing radiation 
                can cause acute radiation syndrome of different degrees of severity. Initial 
                radiation is from the initial intense pulse of radiation produced in the first 
                minute following detonation. It includes gamma rays and neutrons. 
                Residual radiation results 
                from radioactive decay after the first minute following detonation. 
                Large amounts of radioactive materials are propelled into the 
                atmosphere, contributing to radioactive fallout. Radiation injuries 
                are the predominant cause of death in lower-yield detonations.
 5.          
                 Ground shock 
                can cause extensive damage to structures 
                and infrastructure.6 
                The destruction of structures and infrastructure 
                can cause damage of people.
 |  |   
          |  |  |   
          |  The 
            Potential Impact of a Major Nuclear Attack |  |   
          | According to the CATS (Consequences 
              Assessment Tool Set) software created by the US Federal Emergency 
              Management Agency and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the expected 
              casualties from a 12.5 kiloton nuclear explosion at ground level in 
              New York 
              City was calculated. 
              The blast and thermal effects of such an explosion would kill 52,000 
              people immediately, and direct radiation would cause 44,000 cases 
              of radiation sickness, of which 10,000 would be fatal. Radiation 
              from fallout would kill another 200,000 people and cause several 
              hundred thousand additional cases of radiation sickness.7Casualties on this scale would immediately overwhelm medical facilities 
              leading to a high mortality rate among those injured but not killed 
              by the initial blast and thermal effects. Over 1000 hospital beds 
              would be destroyed by blast, and 8700 beds would be in areas with 
              radiation exposures high enough to cause radiation sickness.7 The remaining local medical 
              facilities would quickly be overwhelmed, and the advance outside 
              help would be delayed. For example, after the 1995 earthquake in 
              Kobe, Japan, in which 
              6500 died and 34900 were injured, there were long delays before 
              outside medical assistance arrived,8  
              and this disaster had few of the complicating factors that would 
              accompany a nuclear attack with extensive radioactive contamination.
 |  |   
          |  |  |   
          |  Types 
            of Radiation and the Damage |  |   
          | Ionizing radiation can produce 
              charged particles (ions) in any material it strikes. X-rays, for 
              example, are a form of ionizing radiation. At high doses, these 
              charged particles can cause damage to molecules, cells, or tissue. 
              Although different types of nuclear weapons or materials will emit 
              various kinds of radiation, alpha, beta particles, gamma rays and 
              neutrons are the types most likely to be encountered after a nuclear 
              terrorist attack. Alpha particles are large, heavy, charged particles 
              containing two protons and two neutrons. The ability of penetrate 
              is poor, causing minimal external radiation. Beta particles are 
              small, light, charged particles found in radioactive fallout. The 
              ability of penetrate is fair, causing similar to thermal burns. 
              Gamma rays are uncharged, highly energetic photons similar to X-rays. 
              The ability of penetrate is high, causing whole-body exposure. Neutrons 
              are uncharged particles with virtually the same mass as a proton. 
              They are emitted during nuclear detonations, but are not present 
              in fallout. Due to their mass, they can cause significant biological 
              damage---up to twenty times the damage caused by gamma ray. The 
              effects of radiation depend on whether the patient was exposed or 
              contaminated, and if contaminated, how much radiation the patient 
              has absorbed.The effects that radiation depends on how much radiation the contaminated 
              patient has absorbed. This amount of absorbed radiation used to 
              be measured in rads-radiation absorbed 
              doses. It's now measured by the gray (Gy). 
              One Gy equals 100 rads.
 Patients who absorb less than 0.75 Gy 
              are not likely to experience any symptoms of exposure. Those who 
              absorb more than 0.75 Gy can develop acute 
              radiation syndrome.(ARS)(9) A dose of 30 
              Gy or more is always fatal.9
 |  |   
          |  |  |   
          |  Tentative 
            Assessment of the Risk of Radiological Terrorism |  |   
          | The assessment of the risk itself, 
              consisting in interpreting the product of the probability of occurrence 
              with the effects, is important. It is not an easy case, because 
              quite different quantities have to be multiplied. The risk assessment 
              of radiological terrorism shown in Table .10 Despite the fact that the damage of a successful nuclear weapon 
              would be disastrous, the risk is extremely low probability. Although 
              still difficult and a high-tech-business to RDD or dirty bomb, radiological 
              terrorism is incomparably more feasible than the other cases. The 
              scale of possible effects is lower, but the effects on the economics 
              could be extremely large, and the psychological effects on the public 
              would in any case be huge indeed.10
 |  |   
          |  |  |  
          | 
               
                |  | Table . Qualitative assessment of the risk of 
                  radiological terrorism |  |   
          |  Governmental Response to Radiological 
            Terrorism |   
          | In America |   
          | The Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan (FRERP) set up an organized 
              and integrated capability for timely, coordinated response by federal 
              agencies to peacetime radiological emergencies. 
              FRERP covers any peacetime radiological emergencies 
              that has actual, potential, or perceived radiological 
              consequences within the United 
              States that could require 
              a response by the federal government. The level of response is based 
              on the type and quantity of radioactive material, the location of 
              the emergency, the impact on the public and the environment, and 
              the size of the affected area.When the terrorists start the radiological terrorism, the Atomic 
              Energy Act directs the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to 
              investigate all alleged or suspected criminal violations of the 
              act. In addition, the FBI is legally responsible for locating any 
              nuclear weapon, device, or material and for restoring nuclear facilities 
              to their rightful custodians. So, the FBI would be the lead federal 
              agency for any terrorist event, and all other federal agencies would 
              provide technical support and assistance to the FBI. The federal 
              response would be adapted to the specific circumstances of the event. 
              Agencies supporting the FBI include the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
              (NRC), the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Energy (DOE), 
              the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice, 
              the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Environmental 
              Protection Agency (EPA). Each supportive agency would coordinate 
              and manage their technical portion of the response, and implement 
              measures to protect public health and safety. The FBI would manage 
              and direct law enforcement and intelligence aspects of the response, 
              coordinating activities with appropriate federal, state, and local 
              agencies within the framework of FRERP and as provided for in established 
              interagency agreements or plans.6
 |  |   
          | In Taiwan |  |   
          | When the terrorists start the radiological terrorism, the National 
              Security Bureau (NSB) is authorized to convene Coordination Meeting 
              for National Security Intelligence (CMNSI) to directs 
              the Bureau of Investigation, Ministry of Justice and National police 
              Administration, Ministry of Interior to investigate all alleged 
              or suspected criminal violation of the act. The Atomic Energy Council (AEC) of the Republic of China promulgated 
              a nuclear emergency response plan in November 1981 under the approval 
              of the Executive Yuan. The national nuclear Emergency management 
              Committee (NNEMC) was also established. Efforts of all government 
              authorities concerned have been integrated to organize a systematic 
              arrangement for the nuclear emergency response plan. The responsibility 
              of nuclear emergency planning and implementing are demarcated according 
              to the site boundary. Taiwan Power Company is responsible for on-site 
              areas under the supervision of the AEC. Central and local government 
              agencies are responsible for off-site areas with the supports of 
              TPC. This off-site nuclear organization is referred to as the NNEMC 
              which comprises all government authorities concerned. NNEMC reports 
              to the Executive Yuan and makes decisions on public protection actions, 
              directs and coordinates the supporting center as well as the rescue 
              center. The directing and coordinating center is composed of AEC 
              and TPC personnel and subdivided into technical group, radiation 
              monitoring team and logistic group with the responsibility of collecting 
              and submitting accident information, assessing the accident consequences 
              and dosage, monitoring and controlling off-site radiation and contamination, 
              respectively. The rescue center is composed of relevant units of 
              the local governments that is responsible 
              for notifying and helping the public to take protective actions, 
              arranging accommodations and providing medical care. The supporting 
              center is composed of military units which are responsible for providing 
              transportation means, carrying out decontamination in affected areas, 
              and establishing temporal communication networks, traffic control 
              and safeguard.
 |  |   
          |  Conclusion |  |   
          | The 
              continued proliferation of nuclear materials and technology make 
              nuclear terrorism more probable than ever. The attacks of September 
              11, 2001 in United States of America 
              have provided a wake-up call for facing the threat of nuclear terrorism. 
              In addition to vigilance and preventive measures, preparation is 
              needed for a prompt and effective response in the event of a terrorist 
              attack involving radiation. Government agencies have well-defined 
              roles and responsibilities in the event of a nuclear emergency. 
              The medical teams must be prepared to participate as part of a team 
              effort to mitigate the effects of radiological terrorism. |  |   
          |  |  |   
          |  References |   
          |  |  |   
          | 1. | Geiger HJ. The accident at Chernobyl and the medical response. JAMA 
            1986; 256: 609-12 |  |   
          | 2. |   Linnemann RE. Soviet medical response to Chernobyl nuclear accident. JAMA 1987;258: 
              637-43 |  |   
          | 3. |   Ryan 
              M. The Tokaimura accident: nuclear energy 
              and reactor safety. 2001. http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/tokaimura/tokaimura.html |  |   
          | 4. | Radiation Emergency Assistance 
              Center/Training SiteIREAC/TS). Available 
              at : URL: http://www.orau.gov/reacts |  |   
          | 5. | Jarrett, D. G.(Ed). 
              “medical management of radiological casualties 
              handbook(1st ed).” 1999 |  |   
          | 6. | Julie K.  CME Article Radiological terrorism. 
            NJM 2003;100:14-22 |  |   
          | 7. | Land C. Studies of cancer 
              and radiation dose among atomic bomb survivors: the example of breast 
              cancer. JAMA. 1995;274:402-7 |  |   
          | 8. |  
               Tanaka K. The Kobe earthquake: the system response: a disaster 
              report from Japan. Eur J Emergency Med 1996;3:263-9 |  |   
          | 9. |  
                
                
               Oka Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Radiation Emergency Assistance 
              Center/Training Site.”Radiation injury” 
              Guidance for radiation accident management. 2001 |  |   
          | 10. | Bernard A. Assessing the risk of radiological terrorism: How real is 
              the threat? CBMTS IV Spiez, Switzerland April 2002 |  |   
          |  |  |  |   
          |  |  |  |   
          |  |  |  |   
          | . |  |  |   
          |  |  |  |   
          | . |  |  |   
          | . |  |  |   
          | . |  |  |   
          | . |  |  |   
          |  |  |  |       
 |